Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
yusuke kanazawa | 6-2 | None |
Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Golgari Midrange , Gruul Aggro
Nissa, Worldwaker ranks #4176 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 81%).
Green average: 42.4%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Nissa, Worldwaker is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 3.06 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 5 mana, the average win rate in the format is 48.1%. Nissa, Worldwaker has a win rate of 61.1%, making it 27.1% better than other 5-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|
Cards that perform better with Nissa, Worldwaker than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 1 | 6 | 69.2% | 57.4% | +11.9% |
Tasigur, the Golden Fang | Legendary Creature — Human Shaman | 6 | 5 | 67.9% | 57.5% | +10.3% |
Drown in Sorrow | Sorcery | 3 | 6 | 66.7% | 58.3% | +8.4% |
Abzan Charm | Instant | 3 | 5 | 62.2% | 56.7% | +5.5% |
Elspeth, Sun's Champion | Legendary Planeswalker — Elspeth | 6 | 5 | 62.2% | 58.3% | +3.8% |
Courser of Kruphix | Enchantment Creature — Centaur | 3 | 8 | 61.1% | 57.6% | +3.5% |
Hero's Downfall | Instant | 3 | 6 | 61.2% | 59.0% | +2.2% |
End Hostilities | Sorcery | 5 | 5 | 58.6% | 57.2% | +1.4% |
Siege Rhino | Creature — Rhino | 4 | 5 | 58.6% | 58.3% | +0.4% |
Glare of Heresy | Sorcery | 2 | 5 | 58.6% | 58.9% | -0.3% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Abzan Pixie | 3 | 7.7% | 47.6% |
2 | 3.2% | 58.3% | |
Abzan Midrange | 1 | 6.7% | 50.0% |
Golgari Midrange | 1 | 0.1% | 100.0% |
Gruul Aggro | 1 | 0.1% | 62.5% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.